This is an online portal with information on donations that were announced publicly (or have been shared with permission) that were of interest to Vipul Naik. The git repository with the code for this portal, as well as all the underlying data, is available on GitHub. All payment amounts are in current United States dollars (USD). The repository of donations is being seeded with an initial collation by Issa Rice as well as continued contributions from him (see his commits and the contract work page listing all financially compensated contributions to the site) but all responsibility for errors and inaccuracies belongs to Vipul Naik. Current data is preliminary and has not been completely vetted and normalized; if sharing a link to this site or any page on this site, please include the caveat that the data is preliminary (if you want to share without including caveats, please check with Vipul Naik). We expect to have completed the first round of development by the end of March 2022. See the about page for more details. Also of interest: pageview data on analytics.vipulnaik.com, tutorial in README, request for feedback to EA Forum.
We do not have any donor information for the donor Natalie Crispin in our system.
Full donor page for donor Natalie Crispin
|Donation case page||https://blog.givewell.org/2016/11/28/updated-top-charities-giving-season-2016/|
|Donation statistics page||https://www.givewell.org/about/impact|
|Key people||Holden Karnofsky|Elie Hassenfeld|
Full donee page for donee GiveWell top charities
|Cause area||Count||Median||Mean||Minimum||10th percentile||20th percentile||30th percentile||40th percentile||50th percentile||60th percentile||70th percentile||80th percentile||90th percentile||Maximum|
|Global health and cash transfers||3||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
If you hover over a cell for a given cause area and year, you will get a tooltip with the number of donees and the number of donations.
Note: Cause area classification used here may not match that used by donor for all cases.
|Cause area||Number of donations||Total|
|Global health and cash transfers (filter this donor)||3||0.00|
Skipping spending graph as there is fewer than one year’s worth of donations.
|Amount (current USD)||Amount rank (out of 3)||Donation date||Cause area||URL||Influencer||Notes|
|--||--||Global health and cash transfers||https://blog.givewell.org/2017/12/11/staff-members-personal-donations-for-giving-season-2017/#Natalie||--||Crispin notes: "I continue to believe that GiveWell top charities are the best option for impact-focused giving for individuals and I plan to give my annual gift this year to GiveWell for granting at its discretion to top charities. I am grateful for all the work, thoughtfulness, and hours of debate that my colleagues put into the recommendations, and I believe that the recommendations are as strong as they’ve ever been. I am excited to support the most effective charities I know of.".|
|--||--||Global health and cash transfers||https://blog.givewell.org/2016/12/09/staff-members-personal-donations-giving-season-2016/||--||Crispin notes: "I continue to believe that GiveWell top charities are the best option for impact-focused giving for individuals and I plan to give most of my annual gift this year to GiveWell for regranting at its discretion to top charities. I am grateful for all the work, thoughtfulness, and hours of debate that my colleagues put into the recommendations, and I believe that the recommendations are as strong as they’ve ever been. I am excited to support the most effective charities I know of.".|
|--||--||Global health and cash transfers||https://blog.givewell.org/2014/12/17/staff-members-personal-donations-giving-season-2014/||--||Crispin notes: "I plan to follow GiveWell’s recommended allocation this year by giving a gift to GiveWell for regranting to top charities at its discretion. Allocating funding between charities involves complicated trade-offs on many different dimensions: program cost-effectiveness, confidence in the organization’s ability to carry out the program, confidence in the organization’s ability to spend funds in the near term, judgements about the upside and risks of helping an organization scale up, etc.". Percentage of total donor spend in the corresponding batch of donations: 100.00%.|